Sunday, March 10, 2019

First impressions: Giro Rumble VR (2019)


The mountain-bike shoes that I have are from 1997 and they are a tad too tight for a comfortable longer ride. They have served their purpose in the dirt but now that I'm planning a bikepacking ride / bike tour through Europe I need something that I can wear every day both on and off the bike.

Disclaimer
I bought this product myself and this is my opinion on them. I am in no way affiliated with the manufacturer of this product. I like to link to other sites and I am not paid for that.

Why Giro Rumble VR?

Both my old MTB shoes and road shoes are Shimano and both shoes do their job but get a little uncomfortable after a few hours. My requirement for my trip is that the shoe must be comfortable for 6-10 hours per day, both on and off the bike. There is no need for performance, i.e. super sturdy soles are not what I am looking for this time.

I've been eyeing the Giro brand for some time now but never got around to test them. Especially as they design with laces instead of Velcro straps or boa.

So my requirements

  • The shoe must be walkable as I don't want to change shoes when I hop off the bike
  • Roomy and comfortable over performance. I.e. softer sole but still work well with SPD pedals.
  • They must look good
  • Maximum 100€ to fit into my budget
The shoes that got on my short list were the following:
As I already have looked at Giro shoes for my road bike I thought that this would be a good way to try out the brand.

Also I read the following reviews before buying the shoes

Size

This is the reason I rather buy shoes in a real world store. Sizing is just so random.
My 'normal' shoe-size is 44/45 EU.
My running shoes are 46 EU
My old MTB shoes are 44 EU (Shimano) and they are a tad too small, and my road shoes are 45 EU (Shimano) and they are a better fit..

The size chart provided by Giro really did nothing to help as the measurements were of the outside fo the shoe.. I.e. not the size of your foot. Very strange if you ask me.

After a lot of pondering I ended up ordering a pair in the size 45 EU hoping that they will fit.

Unpacking

The box is nothing special.. Does not even say that it contains the Rumble VR, just Giro.

Box opened and the left Giro Rumble VR is made visible.

A lot of stuff in the shoe that needs to be removed

The Vibram sole of a Giro Rumble VR. Looks walkable. Hope it is.

Trying on the left Giro Rumble VR. The sole feels a little more relaxed compared to my other cycling shoes but really stiff compared to my day to day sneakers.. Could work.

And in the bottom of the box is the manual for the shoes.

So nothing out of the ordinary here. Just a cardboard box with two shoes and an instruction manual..

And they fit like a glove. First impression is that there is room to move my toes and that is always a good thing.


Sole adjustments


I laughed a little when I saw that there was an instruction manual included. But luckily I eyes it through as it turns out that the Giro Rumbles come with an adjustable inner sole to get a good fit for the foot arch.

But nothing of it was included in the box. This seems to be just an advertisement to make you spend an additional 30€ on the Supernatural Fit Kit by Giro.

I am not impressed. Don't state that it is a manual for the thing you bought if it is just an advertisement for more stuff you manufacture. It is OK to include that as well, but just don't label it as an manual. This made me feel a little mislead.

Walking

I've done some walking indoors just to see how well they behave.

The Giro Rumble VR still feels a little clumsy when walking, the sole is flexible but not to the degree of an ordinary shoe. Compared to my other cycling shoes these walk great. The small degree of sole flex does make a difference.

The shoe laces

Ah yes. The shoe laces. The first negative thing that pops into mind is that it takes  a little bit longer to get the shoes on and off compared to Velcro/Boa.
There is an extra strap on the top of the shoes where you can attach the laces so that they don't get jumbled into the drive-chain.
But as the purpose of these shoes is to be comfortable I don't think that I will tie them as tight as my road shoes and thus there is no need for adjustments on the ride. We'll see what I think about them after some real use.


Update: -5°C - 10°C Early Spring Commuting

I've managed to put in some hours on my Kona Sutra the last couple of weeks while commuting to work. The shoes do behave good, but I had to drag neoprene overshoes over them to keep the warmth. The textile on the top of the shoes is thin... Almost a mesh. Meaning that they have a little too good ventilation for this time of year. But after sticking them into a pair of overshoes there was no more issues!
Really like the width of the shoes as well, no cramping from too tight shoes.

Update: 3 day bikepacking trip. 160 km per day

I thought I should update this after some long days in the saddle with together with these shoes.
First of all, I like them. Only negative I could say was that after around 6-7 hour park per day together with longer climbs with heavy packing, my feet started to numb. But honestly, that is pushing it. Until that point, they were more comfortable then my other cycling shoes (Shimano road and MTB shoes). The other shoes tend to start giving me problems after 2 hours, so 6-7 hours with these is a good rating.

And, we must count into this that I've not spent days in the saddle for a while as I was sick pretty much the whole 2018, this trip was pushing my limits far from my comfort zone. But still, numb feet after 7 hours is numb feet after 7 hours, I rather not get them at all.
Also at that point in time I started to feel the SPD pedal as well, it might just be that these shoes are a little more bendy then racing shoes, i.e. not as stiff and that's why the problems occur.

I have a bikefit booked in the next few days, might just be something that can be fixed. I'll update this when I know more.

The bikefit resulted in cleat move, and new innersoles. Felt a lot better, wish I'd done it earlier!




Wednesday, March 6, 2019

Choosing bike panniers: Arkel Orca 35


In this post I'll try to cover why I chose the Arkel Orca 35 bike panniers and my first thoughts on them directly after receiving them.

Why Arkel

My envisioned usage is:

  • Commuting to work (30km per way)
  • 3 day bikepacking trip with distances 165 km / day...
  • 3 week bikepacking/touring trip from Sweden to Stelvio and Venice this summer
  • More commuting to work and other bikepacking stuff that are not planned


Countless hours of research on different sites finally convinced me to buy Ortlieb Front Roller Plus... But then I spent even more time reading and found that Ortlieb seemed to have gone cheap and changed their bombproof parts to fragile based on various comments on mainly reddit (example).. I guess to sell more parts. So that quickly made me cross out Ortlieb from my short list...

I did not like the plastic look of Vaude or Thule panniers so that kind of removed them from my list as well... Call be picky.

Finally found this small Canadian firm called Arkel that seemed to get good reviews... Not many reviews, but good. So I decided to double the money spent on pannier bags and cut off on other stuff for the trip. Hope this gamble pays out in the long run!



Size consideration

I chose the 35 liter pair option. Arkel also sells 25 liter and 45 liter variants. One seemed a little too small for my needs and the later a tad too bulky. So I chose to go the middle way. Also, the 35 was tagged both front and rear pannier whereas the 45 was tagged rear only. I guess I could have mounted it on my front wheel but.. Yeah, probably a little too big.

My goal is to fit everything in these two bags and then strap my tent sideways over the Surly Front Rack.

Color options

There were two options, red or grey. I went for the grey variant as I want to be able to keep a low profile if needed.

Unpacking

Seems to be the correct product in the box... Arkel Orca 35

Arkel Orca 35 showing the mounting mechanism. Looks classy

At this point I started to panic. Only 1 Arkel Orca 35 bag in the box. I checked the included packing-order and it stated (pair).... What's going on here?

Unrolling the top of the bag to open it. Material feels like good quality (based on my limited experience with pannier materials). I.e not flimsy, but quite sturdy.

Opening the top, can see the side pocket. and glimpse something under it.

They packed one bag into the other to save space, genius. Feels a lot better : )

Arkel Orca 35, fitted on the Surly Front Rack on my Kona Sutra on the wall for storage

Unboxed and fitted on the bike.

Now I'll just have to wait for the weather to clear as spring turned back to winter here in Sweden.......


Update 2019-04-03, Early spring riding

Been riding with these to work when bike commuting. They do feel sturdy. The lock mechanism keeps them on the front rack and no clanking noise or anything that annoys.

I've managed to keep out of rain, but used them in -5°C, but there was no issues there. I was a little afraid that the fabric would become hard in below freezing temperatures but I did not notice anything like that.


Disclaimer
I bought this product myself and this is my opinion on them. I am in no way affiliated with the manufacturer of this product. Neither did I get paid to link to any site that is mentioned in this post. 

Featured Post

ON Cloudventure Waterproof, walking on clouds.

In preparation for this fall I decided to invest in a new pair of shoes that would keep my feet happy and dry even during wet conditions. Fo...